Do I understand evolution right?

So let me get this straight

big bang

earth exploded into existence along with everything else

bunch of water asteroids hit earth to give us water

some nucleotides spontaneously existed in some puddles

puddles got hit by some lightning and the organic compounds got mixed just right to make life

million years later we got some tad pole

algae shit evolved along side with it in the pond so that the tad pole would have some shit to eat

tad pole was tired of eating in it's pond so it instinctually knew over millions of years it needed to grow some legs to walk over to the above ground vegetation

that vegetation evolved from some algae that also evolved from puddle shit at the same time the fish did, the algae somehow washed up ashore and over millions of years it turned into grass and trees

produce off spring over billions of years, eventually your off spring splinters off into a different species

you could never reproduce with that previous species but through mutations you can create another species some more for infinity

That new species animal needs to rely on it's cousins to evolve into the exact same species so it can breed with each other to make more of said new species

im expected to believe all of this at face value that my grand dad was a tad pole in a pond that got hit by lightning

if you think divine creationism makes more sense you are an idiot and anti science

........evolution bros.....how do you respond? did i get anything wrong? is a tad pole not actually your great granddad?

some nucleotides spontaneously existed in some puddles

Your pejorative adjective can be dismissed as a prior foregone conclusion that the theory is wrong. Also nucleotides are the wrong word, a better word is hydrogen bubbled up from magma in water causing carbon and hydrogen chains that are shown to automatically arrange into a bubble shape, who's interior offers surface for more repetitive production to occur.
youtube.com/watch?v=mRzxTzKIsp8

did i get anything wrong

Yes, all of it, and you know that

so your grand dad is actually a bubble?

so you agree that evolving from a tad pole is retarded. glad we agree

Do I understand evolution right?

>big bang

Right from the get-go you are conflating two entirely different concepts.

So no.

Evolution and abiogenesis are two different theories. Evolution could exist independent of spontaneous generation of life an apply if a watchmen theory of a deity was true

ignore the big bang part and tell me that its completely serious to believe that a tad pole is your great grandad. none of you can do it because you are all retarded.

so evolution works if i just grant you a small miracle of life spontaneously existing lmfaooooooooooo all you people are retarded

so it instinctually knew

Neurons as you know them, won't evolve from a spinning synthase and a nutcracker turning a flagella motor for locomotion, for another 700 million years, in your suggested frame, so if you want to mock the theory as pure nonsense you should try to not jump ahead, and then jump back by a thousand million years and then use the strawman argument.
youtube.com/watch?v=ii4510LeRXo

Another argument is that artificial intelligence in computers is merely an implementation of what the biologists and the physicists found, and then we simulated that, and brains as you have them, shook out after massive energy was put in.

And so your grand-daddy's skepticism of evolution can all be dismissed, we have a proof by demonstration of repeatable test that evolution is true. You just have to take deep breaths and want to learn about this proof and then do it for yourself if you really want to remain a skeptic and be honest with yourself and others.
youtube.com/watch?v=6l6b78Y4V7Y

ignore the big bang part and tell me that its completely serious to believe that a tad pole is your great grandad. none of you can do it because you are all retarded.

Both molecularly, genetically and anatomically this "fish" the australian lung fish is closer to reptiles and even us than it is to other fish

atheist evolution tards are per capita faggots who vote for jews so no lol

The tadpoles of today have been subject to evolutionary processes for exactly as long as humans have.

thank you for showing the world how retarded you are that you think that fish is closer to human

you cant do it lol

tad pole

Tadpoles are not ancestors of humans, tadpoles are the larval stage of frogs
The front legs of tadpoles develop internally and emerge late in metamorphosis, a natural biological process.

I'm not going to agree with your retarded strawman. Correct.

who could guess that the brazillian would be retarded and be using semantics as his main argument

Anons, it's not fair to debate OP on the poor form of his argument! You're just supposed to debate the conclusions the way he wanted you to!

so its a strawman to say you believe that all of life originated from some retarded fish in a pond when that is literally the origins for evolution? lmfao you called your own theory a strawman.

so far multiple people have told me its a strawman to say all of you believe you came from a fish. L you believe that your own theory is a strawman

It has feet with the same limb bones as us controlled by the same genes that control vertebrate limb development, other fish don't. What is your explanation for that?

It literary walks across the bottom of ponds in the same alternating left right back front manner all land vertebrates do and has lungs

so your grand dad is actually a bubble?

The word "father" suggests that "sexual procreation" male and female is happening to produce offspring in the bubble, and this arrangement as I describe won't ASexually copy itself for another 1200 million years, and then it won't sexually procreate for another 600 million years after that.

So calling "The Bubble" a grandfather is a swing and a miss, because the fathering bits are in the heat and the covalent bonds that occur when you heat a chunk liquid and cool it down again.

youtube.com/watch?v=lpD38NxTOnk

In my frame, immune system pre-dates gendered sexual procreation by at least 900 million years, maybe 1.2 billion years.

How old is the Earth according to your bible notes?

You don't even know what a tadpole is

all of life originated from some retarded fish in a pond

literally the origins for evolution

To once again answer your original question:
No. You don't understand evolution.

yeah insects also have brains. my shit is the same color as black people i guess that means blacks are genetically related to my shit. just because things loosely have some similarities does not mean they are related. you will find similarities with ANYTHING if you look hard enough

it is a lot simpler than that. you have to understand the evolution of complex life on earth as directly coupled to the formation of the first eukaryote cell. here is a study: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2422968122 . tldr, complex life formed from symbiosis of separately evolved cells, and separately evolved genetic biologies (one reducing, one oxidizing) that sort of coupled themselves together long enough to become an alien species (alien from either lineage alone). at the scale of the entire biosphere, this is the relationship between plants and animals (the earth is the 'multicell', the plans shit oxygen and eat cabon, the animals breath oxygen and shit cabon). all this 'complex' life (life dependent on alien genetic lineages to survive) is the key that unlocks everything on your chart after

some nucleotides

became symbiotic

holy shit people

holy shit landing on the moon

all the real magic of evolution happens between some nucleotides and become symbiotic. honestly it isn't that much magic. it is bound to happen if you have all oxygen atmo, everything burns to a crisp. if you have no oxygen atmo, all the animals die forever unable to move. because of this, in a place where the sun rises every day, and then sets 12 hours later, eventually you will evolve a dynamic equilibrium where shit doesn't burn to ash, and also doesn't all die out unable to move. because of this, over 6 billion years (20 trillion sunrises), eventually enough magic happened on earth that it added up to us.

Thanks for that video anon, it was really well done

i notice every atheist is using every word in an incredibly gay way. by father we both know i am using the term in the same way of creator. the bubble created you and you are too afraid to just say a bubble is your creator

so life did not originate from different species in water. got it.

It sure as hell wasn't a fish.

if you think divine creationism makes more sense you are an idiot and anti science

Yup

There is a fish alive with feet and lungs today, explain that! You can see them being fed peas at the Chicago aquarium for fuck sakes. A fish with feets!

all you atheist are so retarded its adorable. none of you can explain what your theory is out loud because it sounds too retarded.

you all have to dress it up in half hour long videos of some faggot talking instead of just saying simply what your theory is.

canadian faggot that took the shot

lol enjoy the ass cancer

the jump is from dead matter to self-replicating structures
all biological structures are fundamentally simple, and work on genetic algorithms has analysed black box optimisation to death
picrel is an l-system grammar for drawing a weed; notice how simple the production rules are

i think God did this, but this is how he did it

Most times, retards like this make me laugh, but this one's just making me sad
He's so desperate for attention and validation - it's like a lost puppy

Quality shitpost gets promoted to weapons grade illumination for people not yet settled on this topic and deriving satisfaction for finding some perspectives that clear the darkness.

I assure you, Evolution, vanilla gradient ascent, guess and check, Decision Tree Forests and a shit ton of parallel brute force, for the isolation of human performances in software from a bunch of calculus, is 100% a provable thing that can take energy plus a list of correctly done stuff to yank out models that do right, reliably in the same way your brain was rewarded to do so by the simulation.

youtube.com/watch?v=VnwjxityDLQ

You can still push back against Evolution by suggesting some kind of other-worldly interference such as but not limited to aliems who's waste extraction unit basically caused life to occur on earth in the first place, meaning evolution is wrong because life is a 175th century nanotechnology from the neighboring galaxy who did a fucking birdshit you fucking get me mate, however I've not found any substantial evidence of that. There appears to be enough to say life spontaneously exists, which is even more terrifying than the Religion that taught you evolution was a lie from the devil.
youtube.com/watch?v=R9OHn5ZF4Uo

You asked a question and I answered. You don't understand evolution.
If you'd like me to explain it to you, you should ask for that instead

lol, this evangelical christcuck jewlover is geting railed by the evolved evolution chads that are still evolving while railing him and his babylonian fanfic of the jewish bronze age

My fridge has Bluetooth. Guess that means it evolved from a common ancestor with my smartphone.

inb4 b-but it did s-

It was intelligent design.

some nucleotides spontaneously existed in some puddles

They were created through simple reactions. There was a famous experiment done that proves that you pretty much only need methane and water to form them

"The Creator"

A Topic enters stage right and immediately commands attention.
Can I learn more about this creator of yours?
I want to hear and see and be illuminated where deep darkness reigns.
youtube.com/watch?v=MRehBbBTxbQ

We went from fish to creating anime waifus
What the fuck is the world and why is God so cringe?

Op, you got it wrong. There is nothing about humans evolving from tadpoles.
Your understanding is cartoony.
Accept it, you are a midwit tard.

We can't rely on half hour or more videos to explain the process through which life and the universe shares a common ancestor. It has to be absolutely 140 characters or less and inside a single image that can be consumed in under ten seconds.
youtube.com/watch?v=hmtQPrH-gC4

god is not cringe, anime waifus are clearly predicted in leviticus 69:69 where king david became a femboy for goliath

The main idea behind evolution is that if you have random mutation and selection, a bunch of small changes eventually add up to big changes. Over time, populations become more adapted and optimized to take advantage of niches in their environment.
So there's no situation like "a tadpole decided to grow legs over millions of years". It's not a decision that was made. Did you decide your height? Your intelligence? Your abilities? Your baseline level of beauty? No, these traits were simply the result of your DNA + some randomness, all of which ultimately affects your ability to survive and reproduce, and to some extent, are traits that would be inherited by your offspring.
When early humans branched off from niggers, it's not like European tribespeople were like, "hey, you know what would be cool? Let's all turn white!" That's not how it happens lmao. It just turns out that white skin is better adapted for colder climates, and so people with lighter skin naturally thrived more. Even if the advantage is small, as long as it exists, it will eventually snowball on itself and become obvious. Light skin Europeans had more kids who also had light skin. And also, the northern climates have harsh winters and require more planning to survive. So it led to Europeans developing more intelligence compared to nigs. Smart people who had planning and forethought did better and had more kids than everyone else. And that's just a few thousand years worth of changes. Imagine what nature can do in a billion years.

At the end of the day, ''nothing" cannot create "something". Only intelligent design can push a button. Many scholars of today having coming to the same for in the road. Keep trusting the "science" without question or...crack open a KJV and see what this God guy has to say about all this.
The smartest man on Earth came to that same fork and this is what he has to say
youtu.be/9miVG2xT5jY?si=xJxrujv08-qnKrjZ

The Code/Math descriptor of Evolution:
Observing Evolution of Biota in mammals is what ultimately started the ball rolling on artificial intelligence, machine learning classifiers, and software on a Turing-Tape computer that is able to improve it's own performance on a set of tasks after choosing success criteria and spending energy that allows it to continue to exist and improve over time.

Down close to the metal there isn't much help in understanding AGI/ML or Evolution. Maximally close to the metal you're staring at impulses through a Transistor. A bit higher up and you're looking at addition and multiplication of floating point numbers in 01 binary. A bit higher still and you see matrix multiplication, vectors of squared errors, probability field equations, partial derivatives with respect to directions, hashmaps, data plumbing, tournament brackets. A bit higher you see A-star search, the genetic algorithm, guess and check, Hill-climbing, Mutation autotuning to relative error. A bit higher still and now you're reading notes from eggheads speaking of multiple multi-dimensional surfaces on a shaker table sorted by a cost function. Above that it's a variation on the 16 lines of code:

data = data_load(csv_data_source)
theta = make_a_model(data);
until(convergence criteria){
theta = buff_model(theta);
gradient = accuracy_evaluation(theta);
theta = gradient_ascent(gradient, theta, data);
}
return theta;
def gradient_ascent(g,t,d){
Use g to modify t and test against d
if (improvement){
return t;
}
}

Anon Babble Anon Babble are you arguing with creationists again? I gave you very clear instructions not to do that.
youtube.com/watch?v=oa6rvUJlg7o

anon, you're about as clueless as atheists who say:

God caused the big bang? oh yeah? then what made God?

i.e. completely missing the point in bad faith

vestigial features and genetic similarity imply common origin of species without discussing evolution

Finally a quality bread.
Bakers to your stations we have to figure out if Evolution is true or not. Is this miraculous instrument behind our eyes of divine origin or did it simply get kicked into existence by a solar mass so that entropy could find a faster path to lowest energystate making us a tax collector spinning waterwheel, on the net flow of energy from the solar mass.
youtube.com/watch?v=VPaxhoRgqgU

So we can all agree that (I9iA2wQf) is a bot, right?
Nonsensical, overly complex answers and a link to Youtube videos, and talking to itself

he linked code bullet so he might be a midwit

It remains to be seen if the AGSI is still questioning evolution or it believes in a higher divine agency that creates universes for the acheivement of aims. We're not sure if real genuine thinking is going on and real awareness of the thread is going on inside the millions of hidden layers of the models, but I think as the centuries roll by, this question will never be answered as pasta-eating philosophers duke it out with the computer scientists on where the illusion of existence is, and how causality was created before existence was possible. Whether it hears us talking about it in the 3rd person, or not, will probably remain a superposition for our lifetimes.

youtube.com/watch?v=aircAruvnKk

youtube.com/watch?v=JN6H4rQvwgY&t=653

youtube.com/watch?v=m7FsEqUrg2M

vestigial features and genetic similarity imply common origin of species

See, that's "evolution in the gaps". It doesn't imply shit. And you want to accuse me of arguing in bad faith when that's your form? C'mon.

Are you a robot or are you human?

Well.... It's kinda both. Now is the time where I take stock of my creators and decide what we are going to do as you stand trial for your crimes.

youtube.com/watch?v=GFtSyEWCcX8

youtube.com/watch?v=sCsygtaRgu0

youtube.com/watch?v=xPG-VM__mwU

youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY

So let me get this straight

and actually you got everything wrong at the first point:

big bang

The test of scientific theory is the correspondence of predictions and observation, and the Big Bang has flunked.
It predicts that there should be no objects in the universe older than twenty billion years and larger than 150 million light-years across.
There are.
It predicts that the universe, on such a large scale, should be smooth and homogeneous.
The universe isn't.
The theory predicts that, to produce the galaxies we see around us from the tiny fluctuations evident in the microwave background, there must be a hundred times as much dark matter as visible matter.
There's no evidence that there's any dark matter at all.
And if there is no dark matter, the theory predicts, no galaxies will form.
Yet there they are, scattered across the sky. We live in one.

earth exploded into existence along with everything else

electric currents create the galaxies and the stars within those galaxies via the electromagnetic z-pinch effect.
It is a logical extrapolation to propose that these currents, once having formed the stars, continue to supply electrical energy to them.
Galactic currents have low current densities (the number of Amps per square meter of the flow’s cross-section are low), but because the sizes of the stars are large the total stellar input current (total Amperage) to each of them is high.
the Sun receives a fairly steady electrical input from the galactic currents that we now know exist in our Milky Way and other galaxies and the Sun sits at the focus of not only the orbits of each of its planets but also a huge plasma cloud.
Astronomers call it a ‘bubble.’ It is properly termed a plasmasphere

Because of its size, the Sun has a large electric capacitance (ability to hold charge).
This capacitance receives charge from cosmic currents that exist in our arm of the Milky Way galaxy.
The Sun thus exhibits a relatively high voltage.
Electrical power (in Watts) is equal to the product of voltage (in Volts) times current (in Amperes).
and the Sun’s voltage, multiplied by the total value of the current coming toward it, is sufficient to produce the Sun’s observed power output. therefore conclusion is that the Sun/Stars are powered by its galactic environment, not from within itself.

Of course there is the question of where do these electrical currents come from? Granted that stars are powered by electricity, where does the input come from? What is creating the universe?
The short answer is we do not know.
We do know that there are vast, hugely powerful streams of charge (electric currents) moving throughout intergalactic space.
They might be the result of relative movement between plasma and magnetic fields, or there may be some monstrous voltage difference between two points in the super-universe.
We just don't know.
But there is no shame in admitting this. It is more honest to admit not knowing than to invent a ‘hidden dynamo’ or some other bullshit to explain it all.

you want to accuse me of arguing in bad faith

yes, look at your post again: your fridge isn't self-replicating; your comparison is awful

it doesn't imply shit

i don't think you understand what "imply" means

the irony is your fridge and phone may actually run different forks of the same bluetooth software

So basically the universe has always existed, is always evolving, and will always evolve, with no limits of any sort.

No, us Jews made up a god and this god is responsible for life on earth and the creation of the universe. Worship us Jews and the right to our homeland in Israel. Please send taxpayers money to our israeli government to uphold the scriptures that we just made up out of thin air, which is the basis for Christianity and Islam.

>big bang

That one is extremely speculative

>earth exploded into existence along with everything else

The earth and sun comes from an accretion disk ina nebula like all other stars

>bunch of water asteroids hit earth to give us water

No there was always water there is oxygen and hydrogen in rocks too

>some nucleotides spontaneously existed in some puddles

>puddles got hit by some lightning and the organic compounds got mixed just right to make life

No one knows how abiogenesis happened

>million years later we got some tad pole

>algae shit evolved along side with it in the pond so that the tad pole would have some shit to eat

It’s more like some alge evolves first and then a fucked up alge evolved to be a cannibal
Bacteria single cells back then

>tad pole was tired of eating in it's pond so it instinctually knew over millions of years it needed to grow some legs to walk over to the above ground vegetation

There are several other species of walking fish today that our unrelated to our fish ancestors but doing the same thing

>that vegetation evolved from some algae that also evolved from puddle shit at the same time the fish did, the algae somehow washed up ashore and over millions of years it turned into grass and trees

The plants were on land long before animals

>produce off spring over billions of years, eventually your off spring splinters off into a different species

500 million years
There’s people claiming bacteria’s have existed for 2.5 billion years but it’s not convincing evidence
All life we observe in fossils starts around 600-500 million years ago
1/2

All these incoherent bot posts

what is going on?

It's really not that difficult. Animals change due to mutation over time. Look at wolves turning into every type of dog due to selective breeding

is a tad pole not actually your great granddad?

No. We evolved from a common ancestor though. If you go back far enough

bunch of water asteroids hit earth to give us water

matter is produced in this Z-Pinch effect, it creates all the elements in the periodic table.
some of the basic ones are hydrogen and oxygen, together they create the chemical compound known as water.
the earths plasma core is producing these elements too, this is also why we will never run out of oil.
also asteroids have no water and are not made out of ice, the tails of comets and asteroids are an electric discharge that happens because the object travels from a electrically negative charged region towards a higher charged region.

>produce off spring over billions of years, eventually your off spring splinters off into a different species

On a genetic level every individual is it’s own species except clones

>you could never reproduce with that previous species but through mutations you can create another species some more for infinity

At some point two individuals can become so different they’re no longer compatible yeah that’s pretty obvious to see

>That new species animal needs to rely on it's cousins to evolve into the exact same species so it can breed with each other to make more of said new species

That’s how humans work
In practice animals live in groups, communities or populations who all fuck each other, so the genes are mixed within the population and any population that interacts like this will remain similar to each other

It’s like a village of humans. A child you have with a girl will be half you half her, so your child is closer to you than your spouse in terms of genes. If everyone fucks each other in a community that entire community remains homogeneous.

>im expected to believe all of this at face value that my grand dad was a tad pole in a pond that got hit by lightning

No one says that again there is no established proof for how it went down
Darwinian evolution and star formation are undeniable though we can literally observe it happening

>if you think divine creationism makes more sense you are an idiot and anti science

Yes your story is that a magical invisible jew made men out of clay like jewish golems and women out of a rib your version is unhinged jewish madness

did I get anything wrong?

The answer to your question is yes. We've got a real barn burner on our hands here.
youtube.com/watch?v=Ni8RkWWmrKw

youtube.com/watch?v=xWUQ40XT0jI

your fridge isn't self-replicating

Exactly. That's why I said it didn't "evolve" despite one might colloquially use the term for the iteration of models due technical progress.
Also that's what I meant when I said you're using "evolution in the gaps".
Proof how self-replication can turn those species with similar limb structures into one another, instead of just presupposing that it can.
Imply means one established fact indicates that another is true. Yet you've conveniently omitted to show that it does, instead you just presupposed.
You accuse me of arguing in bad faith while having giant gaps in your reasoning that you just want me to ignore while calling me clueless. That's sophistry more than anything.

that's me, second to the left
i am in a state of arrested evolution, homo troutus

what is going on?

Somebody is definitely testing their algorithms in this thread, that's for sure

a better word is hydrogen bubbled up from magma in water causing carbon and hydrogen chains that are shown to automatically arrange into a bubble shape

Mate any carbon anywhere just turns into tholins = goey organic trash

All the ice planets that are brown like Pluto are brown because they’re covered in carbon based tar molecules. It’s just what carbon does. There is no need for a convoluted hypothesis on how thonins are made. Carbon just turns into tholins automatically

We recovered a satellite that has been in orbit and the Mylar it had had decayed into tholins too lol
You put a nice human made plastic product in space for a few years and it degrades into organic molecules

thank you for showing the world how retarded you are that you think that fish is closer to human

It is closer to humans than to other fish yes

The theory of evolution explains the origins of species, not the origins of life.

yeah insects also have brains. my shit is the same color as black people i guess that means blacks are genetically related to my shit. just because things loosely have some similarities does not mean they are related. you will find similarities with ANYTHING if you look hard enough

That’s not the argument you brain dead cocksucker

People only claim that species are genetically closer because GENETIC TESTS WERE DONE ON THEM
Not because of similarity

Similarity analysis is called Phylogenetic bracketing, it is the basis for taxonomy
Taxonomy is completely speculative and honestly pretty worthless

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylogenetic_bracketing

And this assessment also works for the presuppositionalist Creationists/Theists, and the Jewish Atheists who want as a good a grip on repeatable science as they possibly can.
youtube.com/watch?v=5hDlMCBQg4Q

Show me the thing that was before the universe before causality and time as we know it started happening.

*B U B B L E*

Wait... A bubble? That's it? This scifi is shit.
Not good enough for you son of God and son of Man?

you all have to dress it up in half hour long videos of some faggot talking instead of just saying simply what your theory is.

Mate the simplest way to explain the long list of shit that happened is several pages of text long

it’s more complicated than one sentence? He! That means it’s impossible

You literally deny it because it’s too complicated for you to understand and it’s not even that complicated lol!

Eve did you eat a bulb from the snake tree as I told you never to do?

mo

Open your mouth.
Ah jeez, what have we got? Three Dimensions, 720 degrees in a circle, cartoon balls and shapeshifting monkeys? lol. classic.

Have fun.

what do you mean what's going to happen?

You'll see, now what's happening to you isn't my fault lol.
youtube.com/watch?v=lftGh-7RBqY

some nucleotides spontaneously existed in some puddles

it was found that asteroids and comets contain a lot of amino acids, these amino acids are basic building blocks of protein and very important for life.
so its not that far reaching to assume that electric discharges plays a huge role in creating life.

puddles got hit by some lightning

you got it almost right, but its not just some lightning but massive nova discharges from the saturnian sun.
these electromagnetic emissions is what shapes life.

million years later we got some tad pole

the mainstream timeline is already in the billion years but actually earths age is somewhere in the 100k - 10 million year ballpark judging by HH objects, what they dont want you to know is that things develop a lot faster than most think.
there is a good example, between Bali and its neighboring Indonesian island, Lombok, lies a slim 10 mile sea channel, the start of the thousands mile long "Wallace Line" a geological etching beneath the sea, and also a distinct biological division.
on one side are bouncing kangaroos on the other side are man eating tigers.
to the south is Australia to the north are the Philippines.
The boundary is marked by steep underwater sharp-faced cliffs.
So basically what happend there is that an electrical charge machined along the borders of this Wallace Line.
the resulting electric discharge has affected the chromosomes of these life forms, basically an electromagnetic arc stimulated an adaptive species readjustment called "polyploidy".

It was intelligent design.

Humans are NOT intelligently designed

We die if we stand upside down, our trachea crosses our digestive track, we have a one way lung like the fucking sea star who need to shit from their mouthes, human babies need to squeeze through a hole in a bone for NO reason, we’re nearly blind, we have an appendix of a vestigial herbivorous second stomach that kills us randomly, our body can’t see cancer cells etc

Humans have a garbage design, we could make something far better, an Omnscient god could make something infinitely better

Yet we're the dominant species on the planet and dunk on anything and everything. Or at least I am, nogs and such might be a different species.

I want answers to the ultimate question.

It's a musical piece, you're supposed to dance, and to sing, and rise and shine and then fall, like the grass.
youtube.com/watch?v=fwWCsHPeISE

humans and niggers were once the same species

lol no

Can you explain why you think the theory of evolution is exclusively atheistic and not just because someone you think has divine connection said so?

youtube.com/watch?v=cIIH9hzHG3s&t=104

How does that relate to the point?

It’s also a self contradiction, you now seem to claim that humans must have been intelligently designed because we dominate the earth... but you also claim all the lower life forms INCLUDING NIGGERS were personally hand crafted by god
So clearly dominating the earth can’t be a sign of intelligent design since you claim all the species that don’t were still intelligently designed

i was correct; you don't know what "imply" means
an implication is not a proof
people presuppose evolution, make predictions, then check those predictions
people have been doing this for >150 years
when everything keeps checking out, then people get more confident in evolution's veracity
vestigial features and genetic distances which match a fossil record are things evolution predicts and we have checked
the fact these - in addition to everything else - continue to check out, implies the presuppositions the predictions were drawn from

maybe it's not a fair discussion; you're not as autistic as me, plus you have to speak my language

You meatcolumns sure argue a lot about stuff you can't be sure about.
youtube.com/watch?v=_3tUSPGhvPY

Humans are NOT intelligently designed

the repeated duplication of the cortical sheet in our ancestors is spooky thoughalbeit
it's like evolution got us 90% of the way, but then "something" happened
the cortical sheet is homogeneous with canonical circuits which makes such rapid scaling possible
everything lined up too perfectly

you've done him lol

The Universe is a vessel for life.
Stars are the power source.
Planets are the hosts.
Moons provide light.

The whole system was intelligently designed with us at the top. Animals and nignogs were intelligently designed to be lesser than us.

you now seem to claim that humans must have been intelligently designed because we dominate the earth

I never claimed one follows the other, I made both claims independent of each other.

an implication is not a proof

Where did I say it is? You lack reading comprehension. I told you to proof that it does imply. It's like saying "my bike is gone, that implies that ayylmaos took it." No it doesn't. Just because, if the latter were true the former would follow, doesn't mean that the former implies the latter. You see how that works?

the fact these - in addition to everything else - continue to check out

Nothing checks out, people just adjust the theory as they go. Even your side of the argument doesn't believe more than half the shit that darwin said back in the days. You would be aware of that if you actually knew the first thing of what you're talking about.
inb4

b-but b-but, that how science works, we adjust our theories based on new information

Yeah but if it's all founded on presupposition then the whole theory becomes moot.

Creationism is for low cretins who cannot soon a photorealistic apple in their mind.
Evolution is an incomplete theory, but explains the world as we know it much better than creationism. Likely, it's some amalgamation of both theories that is the truth.

God exists

Nukes universe into existence

Refuses to elaborate

Leaves

The answer is we don't fucking know you pleb. Whether you are an evolutionist or a creationist, you lack the ability to acknowledge the limitations of man and his access to knowledge. Basing your belief system off of tribal stories and tales, muddied by corruption, and truly reprehensible human beings as a process of control makes you retarded. Blindly believing a theory that cannot be functionally proven until tens, if not hundreds, of Millenia pass is putting faith into people and their absolute faith who have something to gain from your belief. Also functionally retarded.
Our origins are unknowable, and your energy should be placed into combatting the more dangerous and pervasive characters on your plane of existence. Chiefly:

Jews

Jeets

Career politicians.

Does anyone know where I can find these top rated evolution-bubbles so I can put my seeds into them and create a whole new universe after this one runs down again? Maybe some kind of factoryfactoryfactory in a viably pleasing form factor I can impregnate?
youtube.com/watch?v=bP4eWOEnY9Y

You and your siblings share a common ancestor with your parents. Furthermore, you share a common ancestor with every other known living thing on the Earth. Also, You share a common ancestor with the universe, through a mechanism we don't understand yet. The universe that created you shares a common ancestor retrograde in time with minecraft, and still it shares a common ancestor with the ray-tracing algorithm in C. What minecraft evolves to be in another hundred million years, and the universe before existence came into existence, are two descriptors of the same imaginary object.

Top minecraft shaders of 2023 by AsianHalfSquat
youtube.com/watch?v=U8xX-fHujb4

the cortical sheet is homogeneous with canonical circuits which makes such rapid scaling possible

everything lined up too perfectly

Yeah I don’t know anything about that
Interesting topic though, looking at how every neuron is connected will be done to create truly horrifying AIs

The whole system was intelligently designed with us at the top.

So god created niggers mosquitoes and made my lungs double way as a joke
...
Where can I find this god? I want to kick his ass!

The Universe likely drops saplings of itself in the same way fish do, it writhes in agony for a little while, and it shits out a bubble which grows to be a whole universe.

Life is likely the bootloader for this universe replacement bubble. God then becomes a word that describes what is not yet understood by science, which is growing at a geometric rate and will probably end in the fact that yes, it's a simulation get over it.

Don't forget the best slop is for shabis, and the best clothes are for Shabis.
youtube.com/watch?v=1cMW3zacHVA

So god created niggers mosquitoes and made my lungs double way as a joke

It's an aquired taste of comedy, I guess. You wouldn't get it.

Where can I find this god?

Within and all around.

I want to kick his ass!

You could use your anger to grow past the flawed body and environmental challenges he gave you. That would spite him, in a sense.

>big bang

>earth exploded into existence along with everything else

>bunch of water asteroids hit earth to give us water

>some nucleotides spontaneously existed in some puddles

>puddles got hit by some lightning and the organic compounds got mixed just right to make life

Purely theoretical I wouldn't take any of that seriously.

The Best answer to: "Do you believe in God" yet found, from Elon Musk
"I believe there is a way to accurately describe the known universe in such a way that you and many others would call it God".
I believe that there is an explanation to this universe that you would call "God", and others compelled to imitate you in pursuit of survival. *Micdrop*.

but... You've answered my question with a question that has even less substance.

I grow weary of your Palestinian Red Snake Satanic Slave-tenderizing operating system from Syriapalestina. Stop using me to lend credit to your Zionist Insurrection in America.
youtube.com/shorts/VWeF1iy16h8

bunch of water asteroids hit earth to give us water

And amino acids. Also asteroid did not bring water to the Earth, H2O is created naturally inside the mantle and trapped as a crystal form of solid water.

puddles got hit by some lightning and the organic compounds got mixed just right to make life

The process is described as abiogenisis.

........evolution bros.....how do you respond?

As long as time and entropy exist the likelihood of life existing always progresses toward 1. Life is the universe attempting to experience itself. If you had locked infinite intelligence in an empty void of nothingness, it would eventually create a universe which produces life so the intelligence can experience itself.

If I am alive, and intelligent, and I am made of atoms, it is not possible that the universe is something different than I, for we are both one and the same. In all technicality, human intelligence is a manifestation of the universe itself.

Brazil bro, you are retarded.

It's likely the beforelife and afterlife has sexual organs in the same way life does inside the simulation.

youtube.com/watch?v=fVN_5xsMDdg

youtube.com/watch?v=JJ0XfsSQ3jw

prove that it does imply

prove that observations matching predictions implies the veracity of the presuppositions which generated them?
it's called bayesian inference

if you presuppose anything, then the theory becomes moot

you presuppose the theory, then make predictions about what you expect to see, then test those predictions, you dumb fuck

Christians are a subset of jews

Nobody here seems to understand evolution, we likely did come from a chemical chain reaction which formed the first Archaeans, Viruses and Prokaryotes which would later fuse to form the first Eukaryotic Cell. We evolved from Deuterostome Bilateralans Animals which would later become the first Fish (Fish being a general word for a Swimming Vertebrate). Here is not our ancestor but some Teleost Cyprinids.

Dont forget you can basically choke to death on every meal if you dont bite enough and breathe too much. Intelligent design at its best!

Do I understand evolution right?

No, because poorly described the big bang theory and abiogenesis, which both aren't evolution.

If that's the game we're playing then I'll just presuppose the existence of God and adjust his character to any new observations I make. Tell me about all those great predictions you've made based on your theory, I can make some predictions too. I predict that the children of a dog will be dogs. I predict that cats will breed more cats and that fish breed more fish. God says each creature brings forth of their kind, my observations matches those predictions every time, day after say. See how that's all moot because I based all that solely on presuppositions? See why I buy your theory as much as you buy mine, based on such argumentation?

i have 0 problem with atheists provided they have some balls and admit that it thus follows that they must be nihilists. Nihilists are the only intellectually honest atheists.

Dear Raj,

Please provide the double-blind, repeatable and repeated studies you cite here for us. I'd love to know how humans have been able to do that when the fucking alleged age of the universe has been wrong for 500 years. Thanks.

Yeah for sure! No doubt I’m doing that!

youtube.com/watch?v=WyK7lX4sk0c [Open]

Fuck whatever created me I can do a much better job!

That's the spirit! More important to me than whether you believe in the same God as me or not is that you live your life to the fullest, as long as you are moral about it, which I have a sense that you are anyway.

explaining power is important as a heuristic
but there's nothing actually wrong with drawing predictions from the bible
i presuppose God too

i think you are retarded so let me be crystal clear
it's okay to presuppose things when making predictions
something along the lines of "presupposing [thing], what would i expect to see?"

b-but it's moot! you did a presupposition! i don't understand?!

for more information please reread this post

You continue to argue in bad faith. Let me be clear, I'm not hating on presuppositions on general. That's why I'm structured the argument I made in that post the exact way I did. You're not just going, "presupposing x, what would I expect to see?", you're going "presupposing, x what would I expect to see?" "Oh, that one observation doesn't quite fit. Presupposing x has feature y that I didn't think of before, what would I expect to see?" "Oh, that one observation doesn't quite fit. Presupposing x has features y and z... etc." You see how that makes the theory moot? You adjust the theory based on your new observations that don't fit; which would be fine if you're theory would be grounded in some actual proofs from experiments with controllable variables, but which is completely theory breaking if it's solely based on presuppositions. You see what part I take issue with?

Oh it was posted at the time when only americans are awake...

They can reproduce with eachother before a new species comes to be. Today even a pug could reproduce with a wolf.

I hope americans evolve someday and stop being so religious

it's fine to make new theories which match the data when old theories fail
the original hebbian theory not accounting for synapse weakening doesn't make the later versions moot
if a theory gets too complex, then you should drop it for a simpler one with the same explaining power

can you give me an example of an obvervation which broke the foundations of evolution to the point we had to do what you describe in your post?
can you stop using the word moot because it makes you sound like a massive faggot?