Huh it really is like that

huh it really is like that

an admission of total cultural defeat, no less
I loved to see this; they're on the backfoot
look at what they need to mimic a fraction of our power

how is it an admission of defeat

how?
they're using right-wing memetic language to target and convert people fluent in right-wing memetic language
look at the implication: that young people are already fluent in right-wing semiotic code
this is self-evidently because the left suffered a total cultural defeat amongst the youth

otherwise, why not use leftist memetics instead? surely young people are fluent in the neomarxist memetic lexicon—well, presently the neomarxists don't even have their own language in which to express and convey their ideas to the people, only these impotent and tedious attempts at emulation and subversion

the right had success with it, we need to steal it for our own

meanwhile zoomers contort themselves into swastikas for the lulz

its subversion when you use our memes!!! you cant use our memes to share ur ideas!!

thats funny af

Where's that guy from Anon Babble who was putting sọijak stickers on communism posters when you need him?

you sound incredibly upset that people want better for themselves in a system that purely benefits the ultra elite

its over ausfags

anon, do you think 'subversion' is a pejorative or something?
your picture shows the left literally subverting the format of memes originating in right wing discourse—right-wing memes—you even tacitly acknowledge this with your characterisation of them as 'our memes' in your strawman impersonation of me
this is subversion, whether you like it or not
it's just what the word means

and subversion can be a valid strategy, but it only works when you're not the one in power across the Western world, with disney and coca-cola endorsing your message of mulatto, genderbent, gynocratic rainbow equality, with repression and censorship of the straight, White men who built everything you know
neomarxism as the dominant mode of the left cannot ever be subversive, ever, because it's already been subsumed by the system and IS the system we live under

we're talking here about an article of propaganda advocating the suppression of wages and native working classes, don't you forget
whoever put this garbage comic up is an unwitting, useful idiot, who has been thoroughly convinced by the system that betrayal is virtue

and that's why the left are getting zero traction, and are rapidly losing ground, because most people see right through this, and aren't willing to betray their own people for a middle-class, suicidally-altruistic academic ideology of White self-flagellation
it's not happening

I'm glad you think it's funny though

yap yap yap yap "i consume right wing propaganda for breakfast and i talk like a pseud"

I freely accept your concession, gg
this is why you're losing

"you're losing you're losing" is this why england is a shithole ran into the ground by conservatives or

it's coming for you
can you sense it?

i accept your concession, gg

presently the neomarxists don't even have their own language in which to express and convey their ideas to the people

I was wrong here, I take this back
pic related is the language of the left—this is what neomarxists came up with to convey their ideology

cover.png - 2432x1362, 404.58K

you already ended the discussion by refusing to respond, but nice try lil bro

The language of the left is... bland corporate art that exists because art dies at the hands of capitalism

it's art depicting the wonders of the neomarxist society of mulatto, genderbent, gynocratic rainbow equality
this is your 'socialist realism', state-sanctioned artstyle

no, not really, i think its more like what i said and not whatever boogeyman dances around in your head

think whatever you like, you're wrong

why am i wrong

he can't see the parallel with soviet state-sanctioned art

it's pointless explaining colour to blind man who would only argue back in bad faith
if you want to have a good faith discussion, where we can build a productive synthesis of ideas, then you're free to mount a real response to this:
instead of what you did post

>he can't see the parallel with soviet state-sanctioned art

where's the parallel

are you blind or are you stupid?

2032.png - 1240x1736, 1.46M

i don't see it and the cultural and historical context makes the comparison even more abnormal, purely coming from a perspective of

im told this thing (communism) is bad and they draw pictures of people! corporations also draw pictures of people!

I accept youre concession

I think your lack of being able to see the clear parallels—semantic, symbolic, aesthetic—despite the differing contexts, reveals why you're advocating for leftism in the first place
marxism and neomarxism are not really distinct such that drawing parallels ought to be impossible for you
frankly, a retard could understand the argument I'm making

I really hope you're just being typically slimy and disingenuous, pretending not to understand

i think if you read something like The System's Neatest Trick you'll realize that you're quite literally being strung along and playing into the hands of conspiracy when you say jibberish like this.

I actually realised the behaviour you're describing for myself, many years ago—the systemic subsummation of anything which threatens the system, but I personally view it through a cybernetic lens of 'political homeostasis', as that's a worldview which I already find understandable
the system-as-an-organism 'eats' threats, and the digested threat becomes a useful part of the system

but what you don't understand is that you're the one attempting to lead society away from the biological default of racial tribalism—towards something synthetic, artificial, unsustainable—it's you who is advocating the suppression of the price of labour via mass immigration; it's you who is destroying working class fertility and destroying gender cohesion via radical marxist feminism and its offshoots
ultimately, it is you who is preventing class war, via your continued advocation of already-systemic neomarxism
I'm arguing only for my own survival, and the survival of my people

the more you attack Whites, men, straights, the more you're doing the work of the system
you're their agent, not I
they're trying to kill me, not the imported slaves

the more you attack Whites, men, straights, the more you're doing the work of the system

you're their agent, not I

unironically buying into the "white men are under attack by the weakest and most contemptible groups who are secretly the most powerful people or something" propaganda

ngmi

we deserve [...] comfortable lives

Ahahah no, you don't.

so you're like the guy in the picture fighting for The Machine, fascinating

Cut it out with your presumptuousness, faggot

If I'll throw you in the middle of the amazon rainforest, you can go tell frogs there how you deserve your comfortable life, Mr master baiter.

original(3).png - 657x669, 1014.17K

we should start doing that to billionaires first
are you one of those brainwashed third worlders who buy into the propaganda spawned by rich and powerful?

I need someone to clue me in since I'm not 100% sure myself, but is this bait, or mental retardation?

are you just looking for excuses to not think about it?

capitalism needs to be taken out back and shot, but communism is a literal failed ideology. a workers paradise yet everyone is poor, work long hours, are depressed and eager to emigrate away.

we could probably have good quality of life for everyone on this planet if the ultra elite didnt hoard so much

leftism and rightism are both cringe as fuck

liberalism (socially progressive, economically libertarian) is the only sane ideology. no blind hatred of white people or rich people, or black people or poor people. just trying to build a good society that respects human dignity and freedom

economically libertarian

respects human dignity and freedom

t. braindead