Swiping on bumble

everybody sins, and our Lord and savior died so they'd be forgiven

tradcath incel

im not an incel, i've laid pipe in twinks and femboys

i can't even tell if you're joking or not

im not

>tradcath incel

im not an incel, i've laid pipe in twinks and femboys

i think he was referring to the woman you talked to

sodomy is a grave sin (CCC 2396)
you commit a grave sin with full knowledge and deliberate consent making it a mortal sin (CCC 1857)
mortal sin causes exclusion from christ's kingdom and eternal damnation in hell (CCC 1862)
penance requires detestation for the sin committed, and the resolution not to sin again (CCC 1451)

everything you're saying directly contradicts the teachings in the bible and thousands of years of catholic tradition

What's "CCC"?

is Catholic

also retarded enough to swipe right on "Christians" when he's just looking for Catholics

also fucks boys

The Catholic Church and its traditions are alive and well I see...

catechism of the catholic church
vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM

CCC 2396

it says sodomy is gravely contrary to chastity, not that sodomy is a grave sin
learn to read colegate
Also arent you a faggot too?

The Catholic Church and its traditions are alive and well I see...

Yes, i am a very good Catholic

catechism of the catholic church

I feel like some of these catechisms are a bit misleading... idk. And who's keeping track of more than 2300+ laws???

sodomy is one of the sins that cry to heaven for vengeance, right next to murder and oppressing the poor
it is absolutely a grave sin

sodomy is a sin against justice therefore it is a mortal sin

Lol. Also this is referring to Sodom where rape and violence were common place; actual sins against justice
Even if it was a mortal sin, the only sins that are unforgivable are those of which you do not repent for before dying

Maybe giving up something for lent isn’t Biblical and a made up new age practice like so much of the dog shit in modern “christianity”. See the catechism for more examples

paul said pretty much all men who have sex with men won't go to heaven
dunno how you feel about paul but just saying

you shouldn't do anything in addition to what's in the bible

the bible doesn't tell you to sit in pews therefore we should all sit on the ground when we congregate

you're not penitent unless you detest the sin and resolve not to sin again you can't just pray like hell on your deathbed
even if you disagree with the meaning of the sin of sodom, you're still fornicating, encouraging others to sin, offending the dignity of marriage, etc. which are all grave sins
the catholic church is pretty clear about its stance on homosexuality

ignores that Paul didn't sit on the ground and prolly sat in a chair like a normal person

ignores they're no laws about eating therefore you shouldn't eat at all or you should only eat what Jesus was explicitly mentioned eating

ignoring the lines from the Sodom and Gomorrah story that the people who were deemed so evil that God intervened said "take out those men so we can have sex with them" (depending on your version? what version do catholics use? oh right, the funny man in the funny hat does the reading for you)

Maybe you should read what Jesus himself said in the Gospel. It’s pretty simple.

>ignores they're no laws about eating therefore you shouldn't eat at all or you should only eat what Jesus was explicitly mentioned eating

wut that's just supporting my point

practiced for 1700 years (Council of Nicaea, 325 AD)

"new age practice"

LOL

won't go to heaven

not unless they repent

you're not penitent unless you detest the sin and resolve not to sin again

maybe i'll do that when i get a wife and see the error of my ways. Also i didnt do it out of lust or gluttony but seeking love. The gospel of last Sunday's mass actually went over this, being thirsty and drinking from the wrong well so to speak. Jesus came across a woman and told her that she has been married 6 times all of which to attain love and told he she hasn't found it, so she divorced her 6th husband and found love finding her husband or, the love she had been seeking, faith as her 7th.

Here's what I meant:
You said

You shouldn't do anything in addition to what's in the Bible

What I said

nothing said in the gospels about what we should eat

does this mean: we shouldn't do anything additional to what's mentioned in the Bible and since eating isn't mentioned should we not eat?

or because a few foods are mentioned should we just subsist off fish, bread, and wine, i.e. the biblically mentioned foods? which animals were in the canvas lowered from heaven in Peter's vision? how should they be prepared? nothing said there. to avoid sinning by doing anything not mentioned in the Bible, we should just cook fish in wine (with no seasonings) and scoop up the remaining wine with bread. But Jesus was Jewish and observed Jewish holidays. Should we only observe the ones he is mentioned observing in the Bible? Does that mean an Indonesian man must become Jewish if he wants to be Christian and observe the laws and get access to Heaven? Which versions of the Bible are correct and reliable to be included in the Bible making sure we do not break the laws inadvertently by not observing Jesus-made cooking laws?

and so on and so forth...

This legalism is typical of Catholics me thinks. But they never actually thoroughly think things through like I have just demonstrated. Also, this dumb logic reeks of atheist logic. What gives?

catholicism has some problems but holy shit protestants are completely retarded by comparison. turns out most people need some central guidance or the religion becomes a choose your own adventure book.

You can actually ignore the whole last line from "This legalism..." to "What gives?"
But the point stands: you don't have to live life like a 1st century Christian or something

protestants are completely retarded by comparison

based

you are completely retarded
i cannot even begin to grasp the level of braindead stupidity you are operating on

I fuck boys and give them lifelong debilitating STDs but confess my sins to some rando in a box at Mass

Will you call me "based boi" now?

I think you misunderstood. The

you shouldn't do anything in addition to what's in the bible

was me paraphrasing the other anon's line of thinking about lent
and the

the bible doesn't tell you to sit in pews therefore we should all sit on the ground when we congregate

was me refuting it with an example of why it's dumb.
I put it in greentext cause it was what the other anon was >implying
you're providing more examples supporting my point so I assume you agree with me

so I assume you agree with me

I think so? What is Lent? I know it's before Easter. But has it always been that way? What was the original purpose? Should that purpose still be carried on or could it be let on as a traditional practice rather than a real life one? I generally think Catholicism is just about as dumb as atheism, maybe? I know atheists are some of the most rock-headed dumbasses I've seen on this board. Certainly. But I've never really thought about Catholicism other than

why do you need someone or why can someone to tell you what you need to do in your religious and spiritual life who isn't Jesus or God to maintain holiness and the right to go to Heaven

Point #2 which I forgot cuz my brain's too small

Anyway thanks for reading my blogging. I'll try to keep things shorter.

I meant with my post that I can't tell if Lent really is a new age Church invention or if it's always been standard religious repertoire of Catholics with whose practices I don't agree with in the first place

The disciples left everything but the clothes on their backs to follow Jesus. That’s clear but not easy for sure. None of what Jesus said is easy but it’s clear. The council of Nicea created a whole lot of shit to make it the opium for the masses

I met my fiancee on catholicmatch.com. We're getting married May 3rd.