If space is vacuum why doesn’t it suck Earth’s air?
inb4 muh gravity
Do you know how big the whole Universe (space) is and how tiny the Earth in comparison? How can Earth’s gravity hold its atmosphere against the sucktion of the universe?
No I’m not a flat earther.
Google it moron
Anon Babble is not your personal teacher
Wtf I will now worship the Christian sky jew. Please link your donation website so I can give money to God through your church
Magnetic field and spinning and gravity and atmospheres and shit.
It does. Earth is constantly off-gassing into space.
instead of making us all suffer your off topic low quality 1 post op why don't you just fuck off instead ya little chink/poo mountain mutt
So you don’t know?
Yeah. But they blame solar wind for the outgassing.
space is fake and everyone who believes in it is a vaxxed plebbit faggot
vacuum
It is gravity plus magnetosphere you uneducated monkey. Fucking magnets keep air around.
Because it's only 1 atmosphere's worth of pressure difference. It's not that much.
You both are jewish. Get out from my thread.
NHH
the vacuum that is op's mom's mouth regularly sucks the atmosphere out of my dick
lol'd
space *doesn't* suck at all, because it is nothing. Matter however, clumps together due to charge, magnetism, chemistry, inertia and accumulated warping of local spacetime - further increasing required inertia to break "free" into the nothingness.
Space is literally a shadow of what isn't there, where the increased existence at locations of matter warps the perception of distance due to gravitywells affecting the required "electronshells" that light has to traverse. Distance is an illusion of somethingness, inbetween locations of moreness.
Atmospheric escape is the loss of planetary atmospheric gases to outer space. A number of different mechanisms can be responsible for atmospheric escape; these processes can be divided into thermal escape, non-thermal (or suprathermal) escape, and impact erosion. The relative importance of each loss process depends on the planet's escape velocity, its atmosphere composition, and its distance from its star. Escape occurs when molecular kinetic energy overcomes gravitational energy; in other words, a molecule can escape when it is moving faster than the escape velocity of its planet. Categorizing the rate of atmospheric escape in exoplanets is necessary to determining whether an atmosphere persists, and so the exoplanet's habitability and likelihood of life.
How does Earth being magnetic help it to hold its atmosphere?
There are lots of other planets without atmosphere which have stronger magnetic fields than Earth.
Lets talk about the vacuum in your head instead
because the whole universe is electro magnetic.
inb4 muh gravity
But that's literally it.
1G of gravity more than enough to overcome the 1 atm pressure differential.
Is there a pressure gradient on earth?
As in sea level pressure is greater than at mt.Everest?
So why do you think it would stop?
also vaccum doesn't exert any force because it is and absence of something
vacuum doesn't mean what you think it means, retard-kun
Lava lamps were boomers, DND was more Xer
>inb4 muh gravity
It is exactly that you dumb retard. It doesn't matter how big the universe is that "sucks" on earth athmosphere. It's simply the pressure difference and that is not much enough to overcome earth gravity.
explain how rocket propulsion works in a vacuum
You know there are like billions of Earth like rocky planets in our galaxy alone which have much stronger gravity but without any atmosphere, right?
vacuum doesnt pull things toward it.
mass go one way, mass go other way
Rocket propulsion works in a vacuum by Newton’s Third Law of Motion: for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Here’s a breakdown:
1. No Need for Air
• Rockets carry both fuel and oxidizer.
• They don’t rely on atmospheric oxygen, so they can operate in space (a vacuum).
2. Action-Reaction Principle
• The rocket burns fuel, creating high-speed exhaust gases.
• These gases are ejected out the nozzle at high velocity.
• The reaction to this expulsion pushes the rocket forward.
3. Key Misconception
• A rocket doesn’t “push against air.” It pushes against its own expelled mass (the exhaust).
• In a vacuum, there’s no resistance, so less energy is lost to drag.
4. Thrust Formula (Simplified)
• Thrust = mass flow rate × exhaust velocity
• Higher exhaust velocity or more fuel burned per second = more thrust.
5. Efficiency
• Rockets are often more efficient in vacuum due to:
• No atmospheric pressure pushing back on the exhaust.
• No drag from air resistance.
TL;DR:
Rockets work in space because they eject mass at high speed in one direction, which propels them in the opposite direction—air isn’t needed.
vacuum doesn't actually suck, retard. it's not a vacuum cleaner
Stand on a skateboard/roller blades and throw something heavy (bowling ball for example) away from you
will you begin to move in the opposite direction?
Technically you are pushing against the bowling ball which is what gives you "thrust". Same thing with a proppelant
Yes, most of the time air from high pressure moves towards low pressure. Vacuum exert extreme amount of negative pressure. If you go to space and get out of your space suit all the air inside your blood and lungs will try to escape, bursting your lungs and blood vessels and escaping through your ever orifice.
flat Earth kikes are so stupid that they think vacuum only stands for this machine that was invented 60 years ago
Lmao
"Vacuum exert extreme amount of negative pressure"
Not really
Vacuum doesn't have mass therefore it can't exert a force (F=m*a) and pressure is just force on an area (P=F/Area)
We don't know shit about exoplanets retard
its hollow, its a ball, its flat.
we dont know for sure, all we get is cgi and bullshit. they cant come out with whats really happening because earth is just a farm with farm animals.
nothing more.
there are other places that are beyond farming.
Vacuum exert extreme amount of negative pressure.
no it doesn't. it does 'do' anything. thats the whole point.
Vacuum is literally just empty space. It has nothing to do with suction.
Go to space, take off your space suits and tell that to me again.
Vacuum is literally just empty space. It has nothing to do with sucti--ACK!
Okay retard.
Empty space lives rent-free in your goybrain.
We do know for sure. The world and the heavens are glorious to learn about when you're smart like me
its the gas that does any work. the vacuum doesn't pull anything towards it.
the white place is really quite big isnt it
Are you a child, a troll, or retarded from birth?
Pic rel.
If I open my dick in my spacesuit will space suck me off
sky
God's not limited to an element like pagancuck deities
earth has an atmosphere due to gravity
Jews and Freemasons, as you know anon, rely on alchemical formulae to enslave the human race.
the thing about the universe is that its big. REALLY big.
the white place is really quite big isnt it
And yet it's also so small
Yeah it's called Antarctica it's an entire continent at the bottom of the world (sphere)
All planets in the solar system that have a magnetic field stronger than Earth's also have an atmosphere. The only exception to this is Titan, however it is protected by Saturn's magnetic field. The magnetic field deflects the solar wind and stops the atmosphere being blown into space.
The firmament stops stuff getting in or out
retarted flerf vacuum doesnt mean its sucking it means theres a lack of matter
If space is vacuum why doesn’t it suck Earth’s air?
the default "vacuum" state is not a complete vacuum, for starters
matter clumps together via electrostatics, fact
matter clumps around the earth
the clump gets less dense the further you get away,
but the earth's clump extends beyond the moon's orbit
its just not very dense past a certain point
this here is how solar systems are made
youtube.com
The universe is mostly empty and distant, so devoid of mass that exerts gravity within sufficient vicinity.
What's it made out of
the thing about the universe is that its big. REALLY big.
checked
scientisms still have not figured out its proper shape yet
She's gone from suck to blow.
actually its not empty at all, 99.9% of it is filled with Plasma.
thats crazy
If space is vacuum why doesn’t it suck Earth’s air?
It's not. Henry 160 is a vacuum
Don't know. Maybe it's a structure or maybe a force field like the van Allen belt radiation theory that NASA famously admitted we can't escape
admitted we can't escape
thats simply a lie and you are stupid for believing it.
Gravity has an inverse-square relationship with distance, meaning the effect drops off rapidly as you move away from the source of gravity.
van Allen belt radiation theory that NASA famously admitted we can't escape
The Apollo flight paths specifically avoided the strongest part of the inner (strongest) Van Allen belt
And because of the physics of spaceflight, they were traveling the fastest as they were just escaping Earth's gravity well
So they avoided the worst and sped through the bad
And even then the overall dose was incredibly small, pic related
Readings were the average of various dosimeters that they carried on the Apollo spacecraft with the astronauts
ntrs.nasa.gov
Russia also sent a vessel with a "fly-by" of the Moon, the Zond-5, with tortoises, insects, plants, seeds, and so on.
en.wikipedia.org
Also youtube.com
Also youtu.be
So rocks (asteroids) can enter, but we can't escape with rockets?
glass.
without the schumann resonance, we'll simply die.
sorry scifi fags, space travel was all a ruse.
There's no such thing as negative pressure. If you were in a spaceship and there was a hole you could plug it with your thumb and wouldn't get sucked through like the deep-sea crab. It's not like the movies depict it.
glass
If there's a glass firmament over us, where is it?
Why has nobody ever seen it, or seen any light reflecting off it?
How high is it?
What's holding it up?
Why do radar signals not bounce off of it?
I only ever passed University Physics 2, so bear with me as I'm mostly ignorant on astrophysics. I'm an engineer, not a physicist nor a research scientist.
But I would say that it's because the width/height/radius of the atmosphere is so incredibly tiny in proportion to the whole earth that there's really not that much air/gas retained by gravity.
In the same sense that people and animals and trees are small enough to be sucked in by gravity, and all biomass in comparison to the mass of the earth is trillions to one, there is really not that much air being retained.
But don't get me wrong, gravity is a mystery and it's an irrational natural force. It exists because it exists, and it can only be observed and measured empirically. Nobody knows what gravity is and how it happens. So I'd be willing to admit I'm fundamentally wrong in my understanding even if my observation about mass proportionality is semi-correct. Unless someone here claims they know precisely what gravity is? School me, idc
What I do know is my phys prof once told me that, indeed, nobody knows what gravity is. There are fundamentals to the big four forces which spiral into infinity and become irrational in their characteristics. She worked as a scientist as CERN, and I concur with her opinion, so I don't know that any post here could really sway me.
its made of magic and has magical properties
Slide thread
Herbed
Pretty much what I tried to say here , except I broke it down retard style for people that don't know certain phrases and off the rip linguistic explanations of math.
about 100km height.
no idea, a special kind of barrier i guess.
sometimes you can see rockets that aren't fast enough to pop through, scrape against it.
based esoteric elaboration refuser
I take back everything I said and defer to this wizard's authority.
about 100km height.
How did you measure that?
Are you aware that the ISS orbits at 400km?
Or that geosynchronous satellites orbit at around 36,000km?
no idea, a special kind of barrier i guess.
So you have zero measurements, not even a guess about what it could be
Just, as the other anon said, "Magic"
Wouldn't the interior pressure push outwards on your thumb?
In all seriousness, gravity really is magical. It's so mysterious and subtle.
Same with magnetism. You want me to see that these rocks suck each other in and to accept that at face value?
HURR DURR IT'S MUH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CHARGE MUH ELECTRONS
Yes and I have tons of midichlorians. You can't see them but the give me the force. God was really phoning it in with these non-Newtonian forces.
Fuck man, idk, I'll just make shit stick together. I don't need to explain Myself to these idiots. They use grapes to make wine, I'm just summoning it into existence. Can they do that? Fuck no
Electromagnets are far more magical imho.
If you want wire, put regular ass nail in it and power it up, you telling me magnet will stock sticking to objects?
fields dont exist, despite our ability to measure them
I will agree that there's no proof of gravity as a force, just as an effect
but in such a case it means the effect is a result from myriad not necessarily coherent magnetic fields
the pressure is only 14.7psi. your thumb can take that much pressure.
My grandfather is law is an Ork
He showed me that to magnetize and unmagnetized screwdriver, you must orient the length of the screwdriver north-south, place it upon any hard surface, and just smack the fuck out of it with a hammer.
He did magic in front of my eyes and thought nothing of it.
>fields dont exist, despite our ability to measure them
kek that's funny. I'm gonna start saying that. Gonna piss off midwits who like to pretend they know muh science
Wouldn't the interior pressure push outwards on your thumb?
Yes, it would
The key factor is the pressure differential between the inside and outside
Outside is basically 0, and inside it's a standard atmosphere, about 15 psi.
A soda bottle is pressurized to 30 psi, so if you ever held your finger over a bottle and shook it up, you had more pressure there
Force is pressure * area, so as long as the leak is small enough, the skin is easily able to withstand it
Demonstration here on Earth with a vacuum pump
youtube.com
How does Earth being magnetic help it to hold its atmosphere?
Solar wind that consists of charged high speed particles slams into upper atmosphere, air molecules gets hit, accelerate to high speeds beyond orbital speed and fly out into space.
Basically forcebly yeeted from Earth.
Magnetosphere pushes solar wind particles to the sides so they mostly miss Earth and don't hit atmosphere.
As a final word from me, and I know you're all on the edge of your seats to hear it, your ability to actually think about these things and be honest about your curiosity is a sign of intelligence. Maybe you don't have the substance of a formal education, but you have the essence of intelligence.
Because, yeah, if the universe is infinite, it may stand to reason that there is infinity negative force to counteract earth's very much limited force of gravity, so how DOES earth retain anything at all?
Don't let anyone call you stupid for asking questions. That is, unless you're asking for the wrong reasons.
if space is a void why do planets and stars exists without everything getting sucked by the infinite sucker ?
It's retards like you that bring the world IQ down. The void is everywhere and the pressure equalizes . Only in small portions there can be a big pressure differentials
Came here for this.
Are you deliberately beign retarded?
I didn't say your lungs wouldn't empy but that is because pressure exerts force it out of your lungs
not vacuum out
The combination of gas pressure and gravity creates a density gradient with a length-scale of a few kilometers. Over a space of a few centimeters or meters you can’t sustain a stable pressure in the presence of a vacuum, but over a few hundred kilometers it reaches a stable equilibrium transitioning from surface pressure to vacuum.
If you had enough tubing and enough gas you could demonstrate this with a super dense gas like tungsten hexafluoride, its scale height is only about 800 meters so over a tube height of maybe 2000-2500 meters with a vacuum chamber at the top you could probably set up a short-lived pressure gradient.
Or, you could just accept that a pressure gradient is a natural consequence of the Ideal Gas Law and Archimedes’ Principle both being true.
Btw, i've been thinking that we could just be close to the center of this torus. That would then suddenly explain the apparent observed expansion of the universe...
Picrel
sucktion
but in such a case it means the effect is a result from myriad
But why? That's an irrational assertion. You have no reason not to believe gravity, itself, is an irrational non-Newtonian phenomenon, other than 100 years of scifi has made people believe muh science will unlock the secrets of creation. In any case, we would then begin trying to understand this hypothetical "myriad" you speak of.
Every year our knowledge of the universe doubles. But for every one discovery/breakthrough we find there are ten new mysteries. The universe is irrational. It was made by God, Who Himself is irrational and exists in and of Himself and is uncaused. We cannot fathom this, as we are rational beings.
Who makes threads like these? Like what agency? What are threads like these intended to do?
no it really wouldnt
the center of the torus would be the big bang'
one end perpetually populating the universe with stuff
the other end perpetually taking in the dregs
yin and yang must balance
think instead that we'd be perhaps 1/3rd, 1/4th of the way along this trip
the torus is so huge that we see everything expanding from here because we are still at that part of the torus where its "expanding"
so picture 1/50th of one of those squares being our observable universe
Fukken bots
You're not supposed to tell Anon Babble about tungsten hexaflouride.
Glowniggers delete this ASAP
What are threads like these intended to do?
They're intended to start people down the black hole of conspiracy theories, which eventually leads to believing the entire world is out to get you
And by "entire world" they mean "Jews"
I'm quite familiar with the flat earth retards, and invariably they are all antisemetic because they think it's the Jews who are covering it up
That's the ultimate goal of these threads - to foster irrational hatred of Jews
trying to understand this hypothetical "myriad" you speak of.
retard, this merely means that on a macro level, the fields are not coherent/in alignment
on a holistic level, yin and yang resolve into one another
only in very small domains are the fields in alignment
A rocket doesn’t “push against air.” It pushes against its own expelled mass (the exhaust).
What does the exhaust push off of?
No I’m not a flat earther
What does the exhaust push off of?
The exhaust does not push off of anything, the net force is on the engine bell
The ignited expanding gas inside the engine bell is the green P in the image
It is exerting a force in all directions
If the engine bell was closed nothing would happen - pressure equalizes
But when it is open, the gas escapes and a force imbalance is created
The force to the right is no longer countered by the left, so thrust is produced.
There is no outer gas required for this - the expanding gas is pushing against the right wall of the engine bell
youtube.com
Also youtu.be
Also youtu.be
Thanks for trying to explain it. But in your diagram if there is a perfect vacuum on the left, why would the bell move at all?
in your diagram if there is a perfect vacuum on the left, why would the bell move at all?
The post literally explains it.
The gas is expanding in all directions causing pressure on all sides of the engine bell
There is no engine bell on the left side, so there is an imbalance in the net force on the walls of the system
That imbalanced force results in the engine bell being pushed to the right
From the phrasing of your question, it seems that you might think that "perfect vacuum" means "it sucks"
Vacuums don't suck.