卐 BOOKS

Aryan Spiritual literature thread. I just finished this book today. I have had a long gripe with jewish science and this book defies it so brilliant. It shows the spiritual essence within creation.

this is the important one but anon should read all of Evola.

ride the tiger.jpg - 1800x2700, 558.24K

rosicrucuans are fake and gay and a cover for freemasons. Am disappointed in you OP.

Considering how many books there are, a few noteworthy quotes would be in order.

The thread will be bumped and monitored

lmaooooooooo

Evola is a shallow vampiric cunt. He looks not exactly jewish but sure as hell isnt aryan. His writing style is pompous and arrogant and utterly cryptic even beyond the level of free masons. His books are devoid of any useful information and only bloat the egos of people who fancy themselves aristocrats. Rosicrucian books give vivid examples of how the universe is alive and structured and how spirit manifests in all things in a functional way. Pic rel is the face of a sub human

Julius_Evola.png - 361x480, 221.75K

I don't remember most of the content, since it was years ago, but I listened to an audio book on the metaphysics of war. What I can recall is that he touched on the idea of the priest king and the importance of pre-gunpowder warfare on the human spirit.

and only bloat the egos of people who fancy themselves aristocrats.

Yeah, the funny part for me with that is that most modern "aristocrats" are not of the same stock of the aristocrats of antiquity, which are the ones he fluffs up. But it still feels like he is targeting their ego's

He's just Italian. Evola's writing isn't that complicated, if you struggle to understand it after looking up the historical terms he references then you're just stupid

I though that was some lost vril manuscript. Do better. When you find real esoteric writings let me know, sweaty

He's just Italian.

Kek

I read his alchemy book. I've read dozens of books about the subject and his was the only one that was pure wank. Kept talking about how if you don't understand his writings you're unworthy. If you write something entirely abstract then anyone has the right to construe your airy nonsense however they please.

So tell me, why is it that anyone who studies these topics beyond the Anon Babbletier surface level and hearsay considers Evola's work to be meaningless prose and not philosophy? If not can you mention literally any work, thinker or writer that corroberates his ideas? Genuine question. See

His entire shtick was mixing esotericism with elitism and taking this concept to the extreme. He also makes a lot of shit up on the go and throws in personal interpretations, basically the "it was revealed to me in a dream" meme down to a T. His stuff can be fun to read through if you keep this in mind and don't always look for "meaning" in the conventional sense of the word as such in it

Download a pdfs of one of his books, turn to a random page and just look at the pure cunningness and empty platitudes of his writings. His writing is much like his art (pic rel) completely soulless shite. All his paintings are eyesores like this, but I suppose I just don't get it because I'm not an aristocrat of the soul or something and I don't wear a monocle and practice sex magic with dirty whores

images (19).jpg - 210x223, 12.87K

He's not an alchemy teacher. Evola's work is descriptive, not prescriptive.

unworthy

You're simply overlooking what he offers because of your own desires. That's fine, but you're mixing things up in the process. Don't be stupid
Do you mean like academic philosophy?

*cuntishness
Here's another one of Evolas ever so brilliant and not jewish esq piscasso tripe peices which is lost on non blue bloods like ourself

Pic rel is what you are defending

Oh, so you aren't willing or capable of actually discussing anything. Have you considered what you might be projecting here?

Bump for struggle

Tell me what this painting of his evokes for you?

images (21).jpg - 503x610, 40.59K

Is that what this thread is about, paintings? No, it was about his writings. When you're told you're not understanding what his writings offer, you suddenly shift to "look at these paintings". It's Saturday morning, I think I have better things than to trifle with you over some hobbyist paintings. Maybe you can share with the thread some of your own art.

It proves his mind has no quality and his imagination (which is critical of intelligence, intuition and insight) is entirely warped. I turned to a random page of his hermetic book just to show the onlookers at the garbled nonsense that is typical of all his writings. It's just dot points which the reader is expected to elaborate on without context. Jarbled nonsense. None of it is corroborated elsewhere, it's the words of a charlatan

You don't even know how to rotate a camera / image properly, I think you're just an idiot. I don't think his writings will be the only thing you'll struggle with in life, but good luck out there

there are multiple people in this thread that have obviously spent more time reading about esotericism than you have, and your best rebuttal, without answering the question you were asked, is to imply

a-are you arguing for j-j-jewish academia?

And you have the nerve to call people idiots? No words lmao

I wasn't trying to imply anything you dullard, I was asking a clarifying question. Basically "what philosophers are we talking about"?

reading about esotericism

how much time you've read about something does not matter. how much actual practice do you have?

Decipher that page for a profane fool such as myself!! We should really just let genuines (like yourself) who deal in concepts that are beyond ordinary language lead society by the leash, for your pedigree is more elite than mine!!
Behold!! Another well breed scholar!!

evola fag starts dick measuring about practice

lmao don't worry about my practice. Do tell which evola based practices you are refering to?

useless wankers

He rides the Tiger (fucks his neighbours cat and now has Toxoplasmosis)

Revolt King!

Rosicrucianism predates freemasonry.

why is it that anyone who studies these topics beyond the Anon Babbletier surface level and hearsay considers Evola's work to be meaningless prose and not philosophy

Because it is?
He takes some pieces of wisdom, adds in a lot of platitudes and pandering to the idea of aristocracy being grandiose compared to the plebs, and tries to pass it off as some grand revelation of his own.
It's also a shame that this thread, which was supposed to be a recommended reading thread instead became an evola debate thread.

Most people and authors alleging to be Rosicrucians these last few centuries are your typical hacks and crypto Satanist, all these organisations devolve into somethong hideous and inverted, however there are a handful of Rosicrucian writers who don't let back on the secrets of nature. Pic rel is another good one

images (18).jpg - 452x678, 34.38K

It is indeed a shame. Let bring it back in focus. An anon on x/ told me to read this. Anyone familiar?

Jannies needed to make room for another demoralization thread. BBC threads can stay on the board all day but a literature thread is too much.

inb4 literature should be on Anon Babble

Then why was this thread moved to Anon Babble?

OP didn't even use lust invoking image, literally trying to get moved to bant

Fair point.
But is coffee good for you?