Science Black Holes

Daily reminder that science is retarded and black holes are fake.

This is the most comical shit ever.
For decades these idiots told us that black holes are these invisible things that suck now after the FICTIONAL movie interstellar did come out they changed it to this shit!

Because obviously all the scientists where wrong and a bunch of CGI guys did it right.
WTF!

I can literally not take this shit seriously!

file.jpg - 1280x720, 93.34K

If it's fake then why is it real

If it's fake then why is it real

It is literally not.
And history proves this.

b-b-b- all these CGI cartoon on television

are made in a computer!

Your mom is a black hole.

How does history prove this?

OP does a runner the minute he's asked to defend his position at all

Faggot.

black holes are invisible, doofus. that didn't change. you aren't seeing the black hole

Yeah black holes aren't a thing. But the psedo intellectuals within the astro physics field have to keep the fraud Einstein propped up. He is their god and they actually believe the retarded shit he wrote down.
Then to top it off they say the black holes emit "hawking radiation ", in remembrance of the literal fucking retard stephen hawking.
It's a pathetic field of study and i suggest everyone stear clear if it.

How are they not a thing?

How are they a thing? Show me one.

How does history prove this?

Because they change how they look a handful of decades.
Have a look.
Remember when black holes looked like this? Feeling old now?

How does history prove this?

Because it means that they have no fucken idea how any of this shit looks and are making it all up.

Reee SCIENCE

Funny how they never discover that they where wrong about the melting point of gold or iron or aluminum.

it is always this space theory shit that is always changed because of (((((new discoveries)))) almost like theory = made up shit!

file.jpg - 1280x719, 153.85K

thier math falls apart and they make up fantasies to resolve it because they know there is absolutely no way to demonstrably prove or disprove it other then using their broken math models that lead them to the conclusion in the first place.

Before they are purely theoretical. Now they have a picture (albeit a blurry one) so they update what it looks like.

See: >>OP does a runner the minute he's asked to defend his position at all
Because I have other things to do? And I am not terminally online?

its just a possibility. calling it fake is as meaningless as calling it real. something exists in these locations that seems to hold things together, and that's one hypothesis. another is a massive interstellar electromagnetic web. we're in no position to test these things really. we're just trying to sell books and get tenure anon. please understand.

That’s a quasar, you brick head.

black holes are invisible

LOL proof?

Because they keep on putting more and more CGI lights on the official CGI cartoons!

I refuse to actually learn anything because I'm busy or something but also I am right despite never bothering to learn shit

How are you supposed to see something that light cannot escape?

Thats the retarded take goytube cattle came up with on the year of Interstellar arrival, apperance of black holes in the move was accurately depicted by Kip Thorne, actual scientist in the field.

Now shit yourself and die nigger.

Thanks underrated post.

black holes emit "hawking radiation ", in remembrance of the literal fucking retard stephen hawking.

BASED pointing out stephen hawking was always retarded.

He is their god

TRUTH!

Einstein

Now that is a bag of comedy.

Einstain

You can not get energy from atoms my formulas prove this!

Also Einstain (after the atomic bomb)

Ah yes the atomic bomb exactly like my formulas predicted!

The guy is a walking joke.

PS: Did you ever look at E = mc2 Like really think about it do you seriously think a simplistic formula like this can ever be useful? And what dose it predict?

Muh energy conversion into energy!

However

Atomic bombs prove E = mc2

However
Not a single atom is converted to this magic energy in nuclear fission....

file.jpg - 1024x1024, 377.14K

how can you see this invisible thing that we invited to prop up our fraudulent demigod Einstein

Suppose it is sort of like how heaven is invisible

The answer is actually gravitational lensing and it's accretion disc.

Are you confusing fission for fusion?

Things that humans bearly understand have no clear explanation yet

now thats crazy

if you look at something that isn't a blackhole you can say it is the byproduct of a blackhole

Flawless logic. Tell us more about the "hawking radiation ", does it use a text to speech machine to whisper sweet nothings into your ear?

What is actually so unbelievable about a collapsed star to you?

Honestly all of the space shit seems so fake
Like it's incomprehensible as fuck. There's no limit

That’s a quasar

LOL show me a real picture of a black hole and where the magic "hawking radiation" is going out.

I wait.
DO you want Science shows from the 90s?

That’s a quasar

No hat is literally 90s CGI.

Why would it collapse? Why not just burn out or burn up?

I CANT SEE YOU OP, SO OBVIOUSLY YOU'RE NOT REAL.

ONLY GOD IS REAL, WHO I ALSO CANT SEE, AMEN.

Because it burned out and its own massive gravity causes it to implode on itself.

Einstein

Daily reminder that space time is fake and nonsense.

Space does not bend you can not even prove that.

If I close my eyes the world will stop existing

This is the level of thinking of the believers in bending space. Not speaking of the nonsense of be bending space time!

You do know we have video of stars at teh center of the milkyway orbiting around "nothing" which can as far as we know now only be explained witha black hole. BUt I will give a a chance to explain what else it could be.

If it ran out of fuel it ran out of matter. How much "massive gravity" does nothing make?

scientists are faggot kike shamans

>I will not stay 24/7 online in a discussion with a NASA cultist

YES.

actually learn anything

Peak schizo moment, I am the one who educates you on your NASA faith because you are even to stupid to know what your NASA religion says!

A star is a fusion reactor. It's making heavier elements out of Hydrogen. A dead star is a big brick of iron and things.

Our star also orbits around nothing...

Because arent just gas, and the collapsing part is more about size, not the matter its made from. Stars cool to heavy metals, like iron, once the hydrogen and helium burns off.

How are you supposed to see something that light cannot escape?

Here is the official self contradicting dogma of your NASA church

There is a super massive black hole in the center of our galaxy

Also that spot is always very bright in all the official pictures.

You try to explain this one!

So if I get a bunch of iron I will make a blackhole.

One that's even bigger than our sun yes.

came up with

Sorry no. The other way around.

If you disagree explain why no black hole before this movie was shown like this.
You can not!

ya know in the bible where it says something like "god will make a mockery of the wisdom of men"? and then in other places it talks about a particular wise man being just great? its not a contradiction, the whole book is written so that anyone that isnt entirely honest and good will come to bullshit conclusions and those who are honest and good will be able to intuit and discern what it actually means.

god will make a mockery of the wisdom of men

is talking about shit like science, men who think they are just so smart but arent. any conclusion they come to will always be wrong and as a result it will always be changing. The truth is always simple complicated answers are always bullshit.

When in doubt the god particle did it!

ok now explain what that nothing is.

There are 2 limes in here really invested in the fictional field of quantum mechanics. Like they really belive it and want you to believe it too

Tell us more limes, tell us about the warp spaghetti and wheelchair retard radiation

how do you know its not just a burned out star? why does it have to be a singularity?

There are neutron stars that are basically the same thing but not large enough to actually become a black hole.

you can see God you just dont want to.

I just watched that movie last night. Stop gangstalking me.

Oh see your star won't to the magic blackhole shuffle but if you look at this spot 260,000,000 ly away you can so this light. That's surely a blackhole

Absolutely logical and real

What is actually so unbelievable about a collapsed star to you?

You lost the debate.

I repeat the question

show where the magic "hawking radiation" is supposed to come out.

a collapsed star

The fact is that the story always changes and makes no sense whatsoever.

Watch the self contradiction

Light can not escape a black hole nothing can

However "hawking radiation" can! Simply because!

And we do not know where it is.

Or how it is supposed to look like!

How about

There is a super massive black hole at the center of the galaxy

Light can not escape a black hole nothing can

However the center of the galaxy is bright and glows with no dark spots

It is unreal how self contradictory this nonsense is.

These are the problems of your faith system.

file.jpg - 2000x1333, 323.1K

show me the math? I have heard that line before it just doesn't really sell it to me.

Theres more to it. Its a bomb. The bomb is exploding outwards until it stops bombing. Then the bomb cools to heavier elements and the star core collapses inwards, with the heavy elements smashing together. This generates a lot of heat, causing supernova explosion or its protons and electrons fuse to neutrons to form a VERY VERY DENSE OBJECT, like a neutron star, or if big enough, a black hoe.

Do you believe in neutron stars?

What even is what?

(This passes as intelligence within the astro physics community btw)

I don't know the maths to be honest.

The moment you say shit like 'I'm not terminally online' I take it as an admission you are a shill, get your personal info and add you to our list.
For some reason that list is 99% nonwhite.

you actually believe that? are u a paki?

Wow bro wow, when does the text to speech radiation show up? The warp spaghetti?

Yeah because I'm not a retard who assumes everything I don't understand must be fake.

not really it does sound pretty wild that the final form of a star is a single atom consisting of nothing but neutrons.

Anon, propose a better model and we will take your side. We're all ears.

What's so far fetched about a big ball of neutrons?

fission and fusion are just two directions according to the equations. so give it a thunk about it again.

A better model? Just live in reality.

You do know we have video

Show that.

Will it be another insignificant tiny light dot flickering?
Because this is what you clowns only make.

You do know we have video

You say this like this is star trek and we have warp drive to go there and record it.

Pro tip you are only watching tiny dots flicker and make up shit stories who make no sense. All your theories are fantasies!

rbiting around "nothing" which can as far as we know now only be explained witha black hole

You can make up 3 different theories to explain that. Want me to do that? However a grown adult should not make up fantasies and theories because he has a mental disorder that makes him get panic attacks when he does not have a religion/mythology/fairy tail to explain things he does not know. If we warp travel there then we can talk.

You realize that you are literally on the level of primitives who do not know why things happen so they say

GOD DID IT!

This is all you have in your NASA religion!

file.jpg - 1024x576, 203.51K

Im just answering your question man. Why are you asking if you dont want to know? Are you lonely?

Congratulations on self contredicting yourself

A:

You do know we have video of stars at teh center of the milkyway orbiting around "nothing" which can as far as we know now only be explained witha black hole.

And then B:

ok now explain what that nothing is.

A and B self contradict!

I think it just reduces creativity and the opportunity for a chance discovery if everything is so heavily invested in a clearly incorrect model. it would be like if everyone was so desperate to do some patch work on newtons physics to make it conform to observation. like i'm glad relativity works for our gps satellites but I don't think its a good general model. its not the truth and treating it as the truth suppresses the discovery of new models.

I would be pretty embarrassed too if a retard in a wheelchair was my demigod too.

are we living in a black hole no obviously not only in Detroit is that possible

I think light years are fake as are black holes
much modern science is stuff they make up
not to say there is not real science

Did Stephen Talking grope you or something?

I think the distance light travels in a year is fake

Show that.

Sure!
I look forward to you saying "Nuh uh!"

propose a better model

WARNING FAILURE OF THINKING!
WARNING DELUSIONAL THINKING DETECTED!

like you fucken literally have proven yourself to have invalid logic right here.
You are literally hitting on epistemology right here!

This is you

I do not know where fire comes from

Therefore the GOD SHU-SHU MAKES FIRE

No you have no proof!

OH YEA PROPOSE A BETTER MODEL WHAT GOD MAKES FIRE THEN!

This is invalid logic!

Please see: >General Relativity Satellites
Fun fact this is self contradictory.
One time NASA says they need to account for it
The

PS: Oh I see this subject like always triggers the mods!

Link to a reliable source.

GIF

WTF duded did some retard with some LED lights film water reflections in a dark cave? Talk about fake.

I never bothered going to the library like you nerds but also I know more about everything than you as well

Do you believe in neutron stars?

And you lost the debate #2!

I repeat the question

show where the magic "hawking radiation" is supposed to come out.

You run from giving any answers.

Do you believe in neutron stars?

At this point everything NASA AKA Astrophysics says is classified as religious mythology until they can prove their shit.

Yet they can not

Oh it is the magic calculations

Show them to me

Oh we do not have them and I do not know how to do it

Then you just lied to me!

The story always changes they keep changing things it is all nonsense.

Link to a reliable source.

Direct link to the European Southern Observatory page describing the 15-year effort to image it
eso.org/public/videos/eso0226a/

I look forward to you moving the goalposts and saying "Nuh uh" again!

Answer the question faggot. If you believe in neutron stars, and that light is affected by gravity, what is wrong with a neutron star so large that light can't escape?

>I never bothered going to the library

OK and?

Will lies written in a dead tree change them being lies?
All of science is based on theological teachings
1) Assume your conclusions are true
2) Threat them as obvious
3) Never question your assumptions
4) Build more shit on top of that!

but also I know more about everything than you as well

This is objective fact.
I did get you or another brit in a situation, you did say

That’s a quasar,

I asked for you to place where the magic hawking radiation is supposed to come out, you only evaded this question now 2 times.

So clearly I know more about black holes then you NASA fanboy since you can not answer any questions and only run!

file.jpg - 1800x1300, 108.36K

So you trying to use your ignorance as some sort of point in your favour is ridiculous.

And you lost the debate #3!

I repeat the question

show where the magic "hawking radiation" is supposed to come out.

This counter will only increase every time you do not answer this question.

Answer the question faggot.

Can you not read it was answered in the post you are quoting!

I know more then you.

Now show the proof for your magic NASA religious entities.

The existence or not of hawking radiation has little to do with the existence of black holes themselves retard.

I'm starting to think this troll has some legitimate mental issues besides just trying (and failing) to get people mad at him
It's sad

than*

So I answered you question. Now answer mine:

your*

I evaded your question

Yes you did.
You did not answer anything.

So you start with

That’s a quasar,

Want to substantiate that? I assumed this is a official CGI of a black hole because it has the magic hawking radiation there.

The existence or not of hawking radiation has

Wait are you denying your NASA churches own dogma? Is this shit real or not? What is even real in the NASA religion?

Now answer mine: It is like taking to a retarded chat bot it was already answered in Can you not read?

file.jpg - 900x600, 63.8K