I look at it differently. Kneecaping overseas production will give them lower purchase prices, which will increase their local spending driving up quality of life. In theory happy healthy workers produce more. But now there's less to produce, so they start competing to grow efficiencies for the businesses. They start gaining skills, and the products they create become higher quality.
But, they also have layoffs, meaning their employees can now find other jobs and spread their skills and talents, growing the rate and quality capacities of those new businesses.
Meanwhile, in the US which is putting on the tariff, all pressures towards higher quality and efficiency are already applied by the reality of the disparity in labor costs. Those businesses in the US which have survived, are getting a price increase to refine and expand their production of their refined goods. US citizens are being offered high wage jobs in high tech firms, training becomes valuable, on both sides of employment, and efficiencies learned from lean sales can translate, in many businesses, into higher volumes of higher quality goods. US buyers can get the extra time-saving feature option, allowing them, like those in the tariffed country, time to refine and live a better QoL, in return giving them better production, leading to less need, leading to freed-up and skilled workers available for other projects.
In between is the risk, and the unFED needs to lower rates, and WallStreet needs to be fenced out of at least some of the spending choices, else these places shutter immediately when the tariffs come off, if Fort500 internationals are the only groups hiring to factory.